BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//DGR - Deutsche Gesellschaft für Religionsphilosophie - ECPv6.15.13//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://www.religionsphilosophie.org
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for DGR - Deutsche Gesellschaft für Religionsphilosophie
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:UTC
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:UTC
DTSTART:20160101T000000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20170606
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20170609
DTSTAMP:20260501T124028
CREATED:20221202T164113Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20221202T164113Z
UID:16597-1496707200-1496966399@www.religionsphilosophie.org
SUMMARY:Arguing Religion: Disagreement\, Recognition\, and the Reach of Argumentative Debate
DESCRIPTION:Veranstalter:\nFondazione Bruno Kessler\, Center for Religious Studies\, Humboldt University Berlin\, University of Freiburg\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \nBeschreibung\n\n  \nThe aim of this conference is to explore the goals and prospects of argumentative debate in responding to religious disagreement (RD)\, and to shed light on the intersections between current philosophical debates in the epistemology of RD and contemporary theories of recognition and toleration. \nIntuitively\, RD may be expected to occur in three different settings: between believers of the same faith (intra-faith disagreement); between believers of distinct faiths (cross-faith disagreement); between believers and non-believers (atheists\, agnostics or persons who simply do not care about religion). Often\, convergence of judgment is identified as the intrinsic goal of argumentative debate. Can this convergence conception of the goals of public argumentation be usefully applied to the case of arguing religion? If not so\, are there promising alternatives? What roles do recognition and toleration play in responding to RD? \nThe conference will approach these and the following questions from the perspectives of epistemology\, argumentation theory\, and theories of recognition: \n\nWhat is a religious disagreement\, and what kinds of religious disagreement are there?\nTo what extent can and should religious disagreements be thought of as epistemic disagreements?\nWhat are the theoretical alternatives to a cognitivist construal of religious disagreement?\nCan (some) religious disagreements be fruitfully thought of as faultless\, i.e.\, as cases in which\, for some proposition p\, A believes that p (or something that entails p)\, B believes that not-p (or something that entails not-p)\, and neither A nor B is at fault (holds a false belief)?\nWhat is the epistemic significance of “peer disagreement” in the case of religious argumentation?\nHow is the goal of arguing religion best to be understood? Is it to rationally convince the other\, or rather to persuade or to convert her? Or something else altogether?\n\nSpeakers and discussants: Daniele Bertini (Rome)\, Akeel Bilgrami (New York)\, Paolo Costa (Trento)\, Katherine Dormandy (Innsbruck)\, Fiona Ellis (London)\, Richard Feldman (Rochester)\, Rachel Jonker (Notre Dame)\, Geert Keil (Berlin)\, Winfried Löffler (Innsbruck)\, Joonas Pennanen (Tampere)\, Sami Pihlström (Helsinki)\, John Pittard (New Haven)\, Ralf Poscher (Freiburg)\, Boris Rähme (Trento)\, Christoph Schamberger (Berlin)\, Marco Ventura (Trento) \nScientific Committee: Dr. Boris Rähme (Fondazione Bruno Kessler)\, Dr. Paolo Costa (Fondazione Bruno Kessler)\, Prof. Dr. Geert Keil (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin)\, Prof. Dr. Ralf Poscher (Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg). \nWebsite: http://arguingreligion.fbk.eu \nImportant Dates \nEarly registration March 20th\, 2017- May 18th\, 2017 \nLate registration May 19th\, 2017 – May 31st\, 2017 \nOn-site registration June 6th\, 2017 – June 8th\, 2017 \nContact: arguingreligion@fbk.eu
URL:https://www.religionsphilosophie.org/event/arguing-religion-disagreement-recognition-and-the-reach-of-argumentative-debate/
LOCATION:Fondazione Bruno Kessler _ Polo Umanistico\, Via Santa Croce 77\, Trento\, 38122\, Italy
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20170619
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20170621
DTSTAMP:20260501T124028
CREATED:20221203T160745Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20221203T160745Z
UID:16601-1497830400-1498003199@www.religionsphilosophie.org
SUMMARY:Modern Philosophy of Religion: Approaches\, Methods and Concepts
DESCRIPTION:  \nBeschreibung\n\n  \nwithin the conference of the \nEuropean Academy of Religion  \nfrom 18 – 22 June 2017 in Bologna \nMonday\, 19.6.\, 8.30 – 10.00 \nModeration: Hans-Peter Grosshans (University of Münster) \n1. Prof. Dr. Marius Timmann Mjaaland (University of Oslo\, Norway): “Phenomenology\, Writing\, and the Hiddenness of God” \n2. Prof. Dr. Svetlana Konacheva (Russian State University of Humanities\, Moscow\, The Russian Federation): “ Theological ontology in post-metaphysical epochs: from ipsum esse to the event” \n3. Dr. Dennis Vanden Auweele (University of Groningen / University of Leuven): „Caressing God: Between System and Mystery“ \nMonday\, 19.6.\, 10.30 – 12.00 \nModeration: Marius Timmann Mjaaland (University of Oslo) \n4. Prof. Dr. Andrea Aguti (University of Urbino\, Italy): „Does it still make sense talking about absoluteness of Christianity?“ \n5. Prof. Dr. Anna Lama?ska (Cardinal Stefan Wyszy?ski University in Wawsaw\, Poland): „The role of philosophy in the dialogue between theology and sciences“ \n6. Piotr Sawczynski (Jagiellonian University in Krakow\, Poland): „‚The slight adjustment‘: Theological grounding for political subjectivity in Giorgio Agamben‘s messianic philosophy“ \nMonday\, 19.6.\, 13.30 – 15.00 \nModeration: Hans-Peter Grosshans (University of Münster) \n7. Dr. Marcus Held (University of Mainz\, Germany): „Marc Richirs hermeneutische Sprachphänomenologie als Möglichkeit nachmetaphysischem Denkens und Redens von Gott“ \n8. Dr. Marco Simionato (University ca’ Foscari of Venice\, Italy): „Instructions in Zen Buddhist practice and Moorean Truths“ \n9. Prof. Dr. Victoria Harrison (University of Macau): “Philosophy of Religion Today: Challenges and Potential” \nMonday\, 19.6.\, 15.30 – 17.00 \nModeration: Victoria Harrison (University of Macau) \n10. Prof. Dr. Rita Šerpytyte (Vilnius University\, Lithuania): „Western Thought and the Concept of Nihilism“ \n11. Dr. Matthew Ryan Robinson (University of Bonn\, Germany): “Bonhoeffer’s StrangerRighteousness: The Word of God Experienced in For-Given Relationship with Others” \n12. Katharina Opalka (University of Bonn\, Germany): „Performative Action: Considerations on the intersection of Philosophy of Religion and Dogmatics“ \nTuesday\, 20.6.\, 8.30 – 10.00 \nModeration: Hans-Peter Grosshans (University of Münster) \n13. Dr. German Bokov (St. Petersburg State University\, The Russian Federation): „The concept of “paradigm” as an opportunity for philosophical research of a phenomenon of a new religious consciousness (including radical Protestant theology and key ideas of different new religious movements)“ \n14. Dr. Janusz Salamon (University of Prague\, Czech Republic): “The Need of a Global Philosophy of Religion and One Way Global Philosophy of Religion Could Be Conceived” \n15. Raphael Päbst (University of Marburg\, Germany): “Divine Mystery and Knowledge of God” \nTuesday\, 20.6.\, 10.30 – 12.00    \nModeration: Janusz Salamon (University of Prague) \n16. Prof. Dr. Hans-Peter Grosshans (University of Muenster\, Germany): „Religion after Metaphysics? Reflections on Religion\, Truth and Power“ \n17. Prof. Dr. Humberto Schubert Coelho (University Juiz de Fora\, Brasil): „The attacks against the metaphysical basis of religion and their lack of substance. Common detractions of Idealism.“ \n\n 
URL:https://www.religionsphilosophie.org/event/modern-philosophy-of-religion-approaches-methods-and-concepts/
LOCATION:European Academy of Religion\, Via S. Vitale 114\, Bologna\, 40125\, Italy
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR